Hard to Believe It's Only Tuesday: She Needed an Abortion; the Judge Told Her 'No.'

Here's what happened in abortion news this week — plus action items.

Here’s another edition of Hard to Believe It’s Only Tuesday, a weekly roundup of the top headlines, tweets (for now!), toks, takes, and more in abortion news. You can always email me ([email protected]) or DM me on instagram with action items, takes, and news clips.

📣 Action item note! I’m presenting at Press On’s virtual Snack & Learn event, “Harm reduction for abortion justice reporters,” on Wednesday, December 14th with Kate Bertash of the Digital Defense Fund, moderated by Facing South’s Elisha Brown. If you cover abortion or abortion politics or are an assignment editor who commissions pieces on abortion or abortion politics, please sign up and spread the word! Register here by Wednesday, December 7th.

The big takeaway: It’s a lot of fuckery out of Indiana. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a TRAP law that forces abortion providers to bury or cremate fetal remains, and the state’s AG is attacking a doctor who provided care to a 10-year-old sexual assault survivor earlier this year. UPDATE: and some good news out of Indiana! This news just broke Friday afternoon — the ACLU, representing Hoosier Jews for Choice and five individual plaintiffs, has been granted a preliminary injunction against the statewide ban. Their suit argues the ban violates the state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. This injunction comes on top of a another ruling issued in September that initially blocked the ban from going into effect.

The Top Headlines

The Tweets and Toks

  • ANSIRH director and abortion provider Dr. Daniel Grossman — commenting on the Texas judge who forced G., the young person at the center of this ProPublica report, to get an ultrasound (and still denied her the care she needed) — notes that forced ultrasounds do not dissuade people from choosing abortion care: “No one should be forced to see a judge to have an abortion, especially one as wrong on the basic facts as he is. @ANSIRH studied ultrasound viewing: 57% of patients chose not to view the ultrasound. Of the 43% who did, 98.41% continued with their abortion.”

  • < looks directly into camera >

The Takes

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialist Dr. Chavi Eve Karkowsky is in Slate with a look at a new paper in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology that details the consequences of abortion bans for people with pregnancy complications — bans that, as Karkowsky puts it, force doctors to simply wait “for something terrible to happen.” She writes: “The people who suffer most because of limitations in good obstetric care in these states are, of course, the patients. The paper was written by doctors who are no longer allowed to provide the care they trained for years to provide. And in that setting, they wrote this paper to document the suffering and danger they see, which they could have offered choices to help prevent. This is a medical publication of data about that compromised medical care. It is a paper full of evidence. It is also a paper full of the rage and grief of being forced to offer substandard medical care to patients who are suffering. It won’t be the last.”

  • Physicians for Reproductive Health CEO/President Dr. Jamila Perritt and If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice ED Jill Adams are in MedPage Today with a piece I missed back in November but is a must-read in light of the new AJOG paper referenced above, emphasizing how important it is that clinicians, emergency room staff, and other medical providers understand they are not required to report their patients to law enforcement if they believe may have had a self-managed abortion: “We believe there is no place for the criminal legal system in healthcare spaces. The fear of criminalization and/or reporting to law enforcement agencies keeps people from seeking care and causes harm. It pits patients against providers. It is antithetical to care and misaligned with medical ethics and public health principles. There is absolutely no mandate to report patients to law enforcement for having an abortion or experiencing pregnancy loss. In fact, there is no underlying crime in nearly all states. As If/When/How's research shows, investigations and arrests typically involve overzealous prosecutors misusing criminal laws that aren't meant to apply to self-managed abortion.”

  • Chloe Samillano, an URGE student journalist writing for the EmURGEing Voices blog, urges (!) Californians not to succumb to Blue-state complacency. She writes: “Living in California, a blue state with a reputation of being a ‘sanctuary’ for abortion rights, made me feel a sense of relief the day Roe was overturned, a “Thank God, I’m not there,” when it came to seeing all the red states with trigger laws. This type of thinking, I find, can be quite dangerous because it can easily perpetuate a survival of the fittest mentality that contrasts the reality that all of us are connected and affected by this ruling, no matter where we live. Folks in red states, of course, feel and experience the repercussions differently. I echo Onyemma Obiekea, a Policy Analyst for the Black Women for Wellness Action Project, when she stated in the LA Times, ‘We [in California] don’t have as many restrictive laws, but we need to recognize all of the hurdles that folks still have to navigate.’”

  • This Adoptees Disrupting Adoption Narratives series from Tina Vásquez in Prism puts adoptees’ experiences center stage in conversations on reproductive health, rights, and justice. Start here: “Time and time again, the solution offered to state violence is adoption, yet we fail to center adoptees whose lived experiences and areas of expertise touch every injustice and systemic problem our movements battle against. This is especially true when it comes to reproductive justice. While efforts are being made to explicitly discuss adoption as a reproductive justice issue, adoptees’ voices are still not being uplifted in these conversations. Adoptees are building their own movements—including groups like Adoptees for Choice—but will movements for sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice invite them into the fold?”

The Fuck Are We Supposed To Do About It?

That’s all for this week. I’m sure I’ve missed something you’d like to see featured in this roundup, for I am but one woman with a computer and an abortion-news-induced drinking problem. Holler at me — [email protected], or DM me on Instagram, and I’ll try to add follow-ups as I’m able.