Medication Abortion Access Protected For Now

I'll be ding-dang damned!!!!

Here’s another edition of Hard to Believe It’s Only Tuesday, a weekly roundup of the top headlines, tweets (for now!), toks, takes, and more in abortion news. You can always email me ([email protected]) or DM me on instagram with action items, takes, and news clips.

The big takeaway: THE NEWS IS GOOD. The Supreme Court has granted a full stay against changes to mifepristone’s FDA approval/protocols for now; lower court rulings mandating changes to mife are blocked and will be for some time to come as the case winds its way fully through the courts. This is what repro legal scholar David Cohen called the “BEST case scenario” when the news broke late Friday. Predictably, Justices Thomas and Alito would not have granted the stay. Because that is not what they are being paid to do. Repro legal scholar Mary Ziegler cautioned against “reading too much into” the stay when it comes to the other substantive parts of the case.

Here’s what’s been on my mind all week as we’ve been waiting on the what-comes-next: All of these people (mostly men) working to ban and block access to medication abortion by legitimizing absolutely batshit-and-a-half legal finagling? They are all friends and good ole’ boys and longtime colleagues and school chums and they are all working together to do this thing on purpose and coordinating their filings and rulings and appointments and arguments. I don’t care if it makes me sound like some sort of tinfoil hat crackpot! The glue holding them together is the Federalist Society and they have never, ever made a secret of it. I hate it!

The Top Headlines

The Takes

  • I’m at MSNBC writing about the Texas abortion lawyer who may just get SCOTUS to implement a nationwide abortion ban if he asks nicely enough: “… Republican donors and politicians are trying to distance themselves from hard-line abortion stances. Mitchell’s strategy allows the GOP to rely on courts to shore up their project of forced pregnancy, and it may very well work. Even the strict legal solvency of Mitchell’s finagling is practically irrelevant with a judiciary stacked with anti-abortion ideologues. If he does not succeed in New Mexico, be assured he’ll find another venue in which to challenge the democratic rule of law.” 

  • Repro legal scholars Reva Siegel and Mary Ziegler are in Slate pointing out that a SCOTUS-borne abortion ban rooted in Comstock would be the very opposite of the court’s stated goals per Dobbs: “The mifepristone case will reveal the true commitments of the conservative Supreme Court justices who reversed Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Services. In that decision, the conservative justices claimed to be returning the abortion issue to the people, but was their talk of democracy just an excuse for supporting abortion bans? Will they now go further than Dobbs’ cherry-picked history by reviving Victorian laws that women had no voice in enacting in order to continue restricting abortion access?”

The Tweets/Toks/Grams

  • Abortion researcher Dana Johnson tweets Project SANA’s new paper on self-managed abortion, with info on their findings and methodologies in-thread.

  • We Testify’s Renee Bracey Sherman names the anti-Black respectability politics behind the way U.S. House Dems select abortion testimony in this thread:

  • Are you tired? I’m tired. From reading this tweet, I feel like @RHAVote is tired, too.

Know someone who needs a little pro-abortion activism in their life, as a treat?

The Fuck Are We Supposed to Do About It?

Goodnight and good dunk: World’s leading genius thinks contraception and abortion were invented in … the 1970s???

That’s all for this week. I’m sure I’ve missed something you’d like to see featured in this roundup, for I am but one woman with a computer and an abortion-news-induced drinking problem. Holler at me — [email protected], or DM me on Instagram, and I’ll try to add follow-ups as I’m able.